Even More Fun With Baluns

After my successful experiment with winding a 4:1 balun, I started to think about how to package the balun. One of the problems with the Ruthroff design is that the input and output are close to one another. In the Sevick book, all of his Ruthroff baluns are shown packaged in square or rectangular boxes, with an SO-239 on one side and a pair of binding posts on an adjoining face, at a 90 degree angle from the coax connector.

So, I began reading about the other types of baluns. The one that seemed most promising is the Guanella current balun. Unlike the Ruthroff, the input and output are on opposite sides of the core, making it easier to package in a PVC pipe. Sevick also claims that the response is flatter than the Ruthroff balun as well. One disadvantage is that you need almost twice as much wire, as there are four windings, instead of only two. Here’s the schematic:


It took me about a half hour to unwind the first balun and rewind it with two bifilar windings instead of just two. I then connected it up to my antenna analyzer, and found that the response did seem to be flatter, the impedance measurement varying between 58 and 60Ω from 1.8 MHz to 18.1 MHz, then dipping to 56&OMega; at 28.0 MHz.

Although I wound my balun on a 2.4-in. core, the Sevick book shows a design wound on a 1.25-in. core. This core should be substantially cheaper than the 2.4-in. core, and the design uses 20-ga. hookup wire, which is certainly easier to get than magnet wire. Sevick notes:

They are conservatively rated at 150W of continuous power and 300W of peak power. They have been exposed to 500W of continuous power (in a matched condition) for a considerable length of time with virtually no rise in temperature.

That’s plenty good for most ham radio applications.

Assuming that these baluns actually play nice with some real RF, I was thinking about possibly even building a bunch and selling them. RadioWorks charges $60 for a 1.5 kW 4:1 current balun. I should be able to sell a lower-power version for half that or less. And not only would it be cheaper, but it’s smaller and lighter, too. Why pay for something you’ll never need?

Here are a couple of links that look useful:


  1. Nice balun articles. Copied them to my project folder.
    Thanks Dan.


  2. Ronny, KC5EES says:

    Just installed a new antenna and needed to get a 4:1 balun. Now, I might build it. Thanks for the articles to help me along.

    Ronny, KC5EES

  3. Cool. You should end up with something just as good or better than store-bought, and you’ll learn something in the process, too. I know I did.

    Let us know how it goes, Ronnie.

Speak Your Mind