• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

KB6NU's Ham Radio Blog

KB6NU's Ham Radio Blog
  • HOME
  • Study Guides
  • Teach a One-Day Tech Class
  • W8SRC Repeater Guide
  • Advertise
  • Hire Me

Usenet? Really?

October 6, 2015 By Dan KB6NU 11 Comments

All of the Usenet  newsgroups fit into one of these top-level hierarchies.
All of the Usenet newsgroups fit into one of these top-level hierarchies.

Back in the day (1980, to be exact), before we even had the Internet, there was Usenet. Users read and posted to various “newsgroups,” and the discussions were passed around using the UUCP protocol. It really was pretty cool if you had access to a computer that was able to get a “news feed.”

Oddly enough, Usenet is still with us. I’m not exactly sure why, seeing as how we now have much better ways of discussing amateur radio, including web-based forums, such as Reddit. Heck, I even think eHam.Net forums might be preferable to participating the amateur radio newsgroups.

A lot of the newsgroups now exist as Google Groups. This has expanded access to the groups, but even so, I don’t think that there is a lot of participation.

One of the problems with newsgroups is that they tended to turn into “flame wars.” Another was that the spammers would get hold of them and flood a newsgroup with spam. To combat that, many newsgroups became moderated newsgroups. In a moderated newsgroup, only posts that a moderator approved would appear on the newsgroup.

The reason I bring all this up is that I was asked a couple of months ago if I would allow my blog posts to appear on the newsgroup rec.radio.amateur. I gave my permission, and it’s been appearing there ever since.

Recently, the same fellow asked if I would post about the formation of uk.radio.amateur.moderated, a moderated newsgroup for hams in the U.K. Before the group can actually go live, there has to be some discussion about the purpose of the new group and why it should be formed. You can read the request for discussion (RFD) here.

Frankly, I’m already overloaded. I should be cutting down on what I already subscribe to, so I won’t be joining this group. If you’re in the U.K., though, you might find the group interesting and useful.

Related posts:

  1. QRP-Tech is dead. Long live qrptech!
  2. New ARRL online groups a bit of a yawner
  3. Home Brew Lists
  4. Want to Know More About Antennas? Join a Yahoo Group.

Filed Under: On the Internet

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Matt KC4YLV says

    October 6, 2015 at 4:37 pm

    Usenet is still around because it has been defended as having common carrier status in the courts. Long story short, you (if you were an Internet provider) can’t be held liable for anything coming across the Usenet pipe. In addition it’s decentralized (imagine the chaos if the qrz admins just Up And Quit one day) somewhat, and there are technical rules for pulling content down. You can’t just DMCA everything and empty it out.

    Hope this illuminates! Usenet is a pretty greybeard territory, but it’s still around for very good reasons.

    Reply
    • Goody K3NG says

      October 7, 2015 at 8:04 am

      >imagine the chaos if the qrz admins just Up And Quit one day

      We can only hope :-)

      But seriously, there are several other good callsign database websites out there, and much better, friendly discussion forums.

      Regarding Usenet common carrier status, 13 years ago or so here in Eastern PA I informed a major ISP that they were carrying illegal content in Usenet groups dedicated specifically for that content. Their attorney basically told me to go pound sand as it was content originating outside of their network. And he said this despite the fact that you can configure a Usenet server to not carry certain groups from its newsfeed.

      Reply
  2. Dan KB6NU says

    October 6, 2015 at 5:17 pm

    I’m not sure that that it follows that the liability protection is really a reason for its continued existence. If users are interested in using it, wouldn’t it just wither away? Yes, there are still users, but I’m wondering if it’s worth the effort to keep it going.

    As far as it being “graybeard” territory, I resemble that remark!

    Reply
  3. Goody K3NG says

    October 6, 2015 at 10:04 pm

    There’s one reason there is still interest in Usenet: porn binaries.

    Reply
  4. Lloyd Colston says

    October 7, 2015 at 12:23 pm

    Of course USENET remains. It is one SURE place to get valuable information.

    Now we have Facebook and a kazillion amateur radio groups there. Do you remember Yahoo groups? Of course, you can find a kazillion amateur radio groups there. You mentioned Google Groups, ditto. Reddit? newsvine? QRZ? Eham? QRZnow? Everyone with an axe to grind can grind it there.

    You have a blog. I have a blog. Everyone can have a blog. :)

    Thankfully, there’s https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rec.radio.amateur.moderated … a moderated USENET amateur radio group designed to keep spam AND flamewars out. :)

    73

    Reply
    • Dan KB6NU says

      October 7, 2015 at 2:46 pm

      Thankfully? For a while now, my blog posts have been re-posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated. I just did a quick scan of that group, and it looks pretty dead to me. The only content seem to be blog reposts–there’s next to nothing in the way of original content.

      Reply
      • Lloyd Colston says

        October 8, 2015 at 12:24 pm

        I thought blog posts WERE original content. :)

        Be safe.

        Lloyd

        Reply
        • Dan KB6NU says

          October 8, 2015 at 12:52 pm

          OK. My bad. I mean content produced by the group’s subscribers. I did an even deeper dig this morning, Over the past two months, only seven posts have replies, and only two of them have more than one reply.

          It’s dead, Jim.

          Reply
  5. Yuanjian Volle says

    July 19, 2016 at 5:28 am

    Usenet has been around long before the (www) web. I have used Usenet servers almost daily, for at least 20 years. In the last days of 2011, I decided to pull the plug, and give Usenet up “cold turkey”.

    Reply
    • Dan KB6NU says

      July 19, 2016 at 8:52 am

      That’s my point. The only people still using Usenet are the diehards.

      Reply
  6. Michael Black says

    February 6, 2021 at 3:15 pm

    A big thing that killed the rec.radio.* hierarchy was the same bozo that thought it needed a moderated newsgroup.

    That went nowhere, but he thought it meant it gave him some sort of authority, so he proceeded to spam the full hierarchy with junk posts. Like your blog posts sent to the hierarchy. Yes, traffic slowed down, but it became harder and harder for real posts when they were lost by the constant spam. So now there is no actual content there.

    The bozo thought “curated” content would be good, but if nobody’s reading the hierarchy, why wouod content available elsewhere be useful? This isn’t 1995 when people could read usenet but not have access to the web.

    It’s a hideous thing. Most of it is just pointers to other things. Initially people would reply to the ones that were full posts, but the spam was one way, people like you weren’t there to listen. And once a site is tagged as “valuable” it no longeer matters what the person is writing, it gets dumped to the hierarchy even if it’s not related to ham radio, or even to the specific subgroup.

    The contempt for usenet is incredible. All kinds of people “know” it’s bad, but they generally have never been participants. You have to do a bit of work to use usenet, that’s the initial problem. Pretty much everything came after that, all the “better” things derive from usenet. Google never helped, they make usenet like it only exists at google, which creates problems fir people using usenet as intended. That’s no better tyan tge bozo in the rec.radio.* hierarchy who thinks he has the right to “improve” it by controlling it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

No Nonsense Technician Class License Study Guide (for tests given between July 2026 and June 2030)

New No Nonsense Technican Class Study Guide now available!

The 2026 version of my Tech Class study guide is now available, and as always, the PDF version is FREE!. The ePub version costs $11.97, and a Kindle version and paperback version will be available on Amazon shortly.

Click here to get all of my "No Nonsense" study guides.

Also available: The CW Geek's Guide to Having Fun with Morse Code

W5SWL.Com
Retevis Ailunce H1 DMR Radio
DXpander: Cobweb antennas, Laser Cutting

You’ve got mail!

Enter your email address below and get an email every time I publish a new post.

Email


I frequently teach classes to help newcomers get their licenses. The next class will take place on Saturday, October 10, 2026 on the University of Michigan campus. Click here for more information.

If you can't make the class, subscribe to the mailing list to be notified of when the next class will be held.

You can always download my free study guide, and if you have any questions about the classes, or amateur radio in general, please feel free to email me directly.

Support KB6NU.Com

Donate $7.30 and get two of these cool stickers. Measuring 4.25-in. W by 2.75-in. H, it's perfect for your car, your shack, or wherever!

Contact me

If you have a question or comment about one of my blog posts, or a question about any of the material in my study guides, or just a question about ham radio in general, you can email me at [email protected].

Blogs You Should Also Read

  • AE5X: A CW-centric blog from Kingswood, Texas
  • K0LWC Blog
  • LA3ZA Ham Radio Blog
  • Little Radios, Big Fun – WB3GCK
  • Mr. Vacuum Tube's Blog
  • Radio Artisan – K3NG
  • The K0NR Weblog
  • VE3WDM's QRP Ham Radio Blog
  • W2LJ’s Blog

Ham Radio Websites

  • Dashtoons – The Hammin' Comedy by Jeff K1NSS

Podcasts

  • ICQ Podcast
  • Linux in the Ham Schack
  • No Nonsense Amateur Radio Podcast
  • Resonant Frequency Amateur Radio Podcast

Recent Comments

  • Dan KB6NU on The EMF Explorer: A badge for ham radio?
  • Travis Good on The EMF Explorer: A badge for ham radio?
  • MARTIN ROBERT ROTHFIELD on The EMF Explorer: A badge for ham radio?
  • Mike Chen on Operating Notes, January 5, 2026
  • Rob W4ZNG on The EMF Explorer: A badge for ham radio?

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Footer

Copyright © 2026 Daniel M. Romanchik, KB6NU · Log in