The Wesco BN-1

The latest buzz on the Glowbugs mailing list is about the sale of a Weskit BN-1. This rig, apparently sold by Western Radio of Kearney, NE is a one- or two-tube “Novice transmitter/receiver.” It originally sold in kit form for $14.95, assembled and test $19.95.

bn1

Sheldon, KC0CW, actually has a very nice writeup, which includes a schematic, about this radio. In part, he writes:

The Weskit transmitter-receiver was made by Western Radio (a.k.a. Western Electronics) of Kearney, Nebraska, around the 1956/1957 time period. It is an extremely simple rig, using only a single 7 pin miniature type 3A5 tube. This dual triode tube, which typically serves as a push-pull audio output tube in battery powered portable receivers, performs the transmit function with one triode, and the receive functions with the other. The front panel as shown above, is made of thin sheet metal, with a rather attractive gray paint job with red screen printed markings. The sides, top, and bottom of the box are made of a plastic impregnated cardboard, while the back of the unit remains open.

The transmitter is a modified Pierce crystal controlled oscillator on the 80 or 40 meter amateur bands. The L-C tuned plate tank circuit is link coupled to the antenna, and a type 1843 incandescent lamp in the antenna circuit is used as a tuning indicator. After tuning, the lamp is to be replaced with a type 41 lamp to reduce resistive losses. Power input can be as much as 5 watts with 180 volt supply, however the instructions suggest plate supply voltages as low as 45 volts, with “nominal” operation at 90 volts, with about 1 to 1.5 watts input. Snap on clips are provided for connection to dry cell batteries for high voltage, and a single D-cell battery holder is provided for the filament supply. Switching from transmit to receive applies filament power to only the half of the tube which is in operation.

The receiver is a regenerative type. Regeneration is controlled by a potentiometer across the feedback winding of the tuning coil. Frequency coverage is claimed to be 3400 kc to 8000 kc in the manual, however dial calibration does not go below 3500 kc. Audio output is intended to be fed to high impedance headphones. An optional stage of audio amplification using a type 3V4 tube can be added for operation of a small speaker. A pre-punched hole in the chassis can be utilized for the purpose of mounting the additional tube.

As you can imagine, comments were mixed.

One guy commented, “What a cutsy-kewl rig; and it’s DC powered to boot!”

Another replied, “I remember seeing an ad for the bn-1 when I was a novice and taking offense at the word ‘novice’ emblazoned on the face of the poorest excuse for a lunchbox with knobs I had ever envisioned. I still think that abomination was designed and marketed as a joke. I just cannot imagine any sane ham buying, building, or even wanting something that crude. The folk that brought that thing to market were confusing the words amateur and fool.”

A third said, “The thing with such gizmos, like the one-transistor radios and such that were advertised in the same era magazines, is not to expect miracles for your money. That the ad was the size of a postage stamp should be a clue to any reasonable reader that you were not dealing with the National, Hammarlund, or Hallicrafter class. The thing does work, whether you like it or not. What’s not to work?

“A 1-watt transmitter and a 1 or 2 tube receiver. Granted, the
tuning rate is atrocious, but it was intended to just tune to the frequency of the crystal.

“I prefer to consider such gizmotron products as kind of a friendly joke. The buyer understands, somewhere in his head, not to expect miracles, but you can still hope for them. The company provides a not-expensive learning experience (and I don’t mean learning about being ripped off!! ) and makes a little money as well.”

It does kind of amaze me that someone would actually buy one of these things, but as the last guy says, you could get them to work, and if they weren’t stellar performers, they were cheap, so it was an inexpensive education.

Comments

  1. David Brodbeck N8SRE says:

    I saw that on Ebay, too, and was kind of intrigued by it. Thanks for the writeup.

    Before passing judgment on this rig, I think it’s important to remember that this was an era when Novices had to use crystal-controlled transmitters, *and* a Novice license was non-renewable. You either upgraded before it expired, or you were out of the hobby. People may not have wanted to spend much money on what was bound to be a temporary radio, since after upgrading to General they’d probably want to step up to a VFO rig.

  2. Hi Dan,

    One of the comments you made was it was cheap, and wouldn’t matter if it didn’t work too well. In 1956/57 my father was making $4200 a year. That’s less than $12 per day and was as a skilled tradesman in a Ford factory.

    I bet that there wern’t too many sold in my neighborhood. Not exactly cheap, when I was sent to the corner store to buy a loaf of bread, 2 pounds of hamburger and a bottle of ketchup with a dollar. My mother was there to collect the change when I returned.

    73!
    Jim K8ELR

  3. David Brodbeck N8SRE says:

    Jim’s comment prompted me to go visit the inflation calculator (http://www.westegg.com/inflation/) and find out how much $14.95 in 1956 would be in today’s dollars. It worked out to $112.87. That does seem like a lot of money for what you get; on the other hand, I can’t think of a new HF transceiver you can buy for under $120 today! Even finding a used one for that price would be tough.

  4. Don Dulmage says:

    I read the neg comments. What a clod! I found the rig interesting. in fact i have seen a scheatic of it somewhere and contemplated duplicating it. Of Couse inlike the commenter I wasnt born perfect. i sitll have a sense of adventure and curiosity. I still weara wind up watch too. Forty years old without problems and so far has never even needed a battery.

  5. I bought a Weskit BN-1 in the late 1950s after seeing their small ad in the back of an electronics magazine, Popular Electronics if I remember right.

    Although I did not have my Novice license yet I got all excited when I connected the battery and an antenna wire and could hear “CHU Dominion Observatory Canada” (the time station).

    I remember calling to my mother, “Quick, come up stairs and listen, I can hear Canada on this thing.” The excitement of that moment will be with me forever. I went on to get my Novice, and am now Extra with over 50 years as a ham. But it started with that BN-1, which I still have in the closet. Maybe I’ll take it out tomorrow and fire it up?

    The $14.95 price wasn’t all that expensive even back then.

    The excitement of hearing CHU for the very first time on that BN-1…PRICELESS !!!

    Rodger
    W4FM

  6. I have been a ham since receiving my novice license in April, 1957. If I had known about the BN-1 it might have happened a couple of years earlier. I still strongly support the “KISS” (Keep It Simple Stupid) philosophy. I can only imagine the thrill of the first contact happening with a radio like this, built by me!!

  7. Ralph E. Taggart says:

    I actually had one of these as a novice back in 1957. It was a piece of junk that ate expensive batteries. Never has a QSO.

    Ralph
    WB8DQT

  8. Lawrence Beshore says:

    It is very interesting reading all the posts by people who have varied opinions about the BN-1.

    This was one of the many products designed and built by my father. He owned Western Radio of
    Kearney, Nebraska. His name was Paul Beshore and to me and my brothers he was a brilliant man.
    He had many reasons for designing the way he did. First among those was he always tried to make the product affordable.
    This alone allowed many people to get involved in radio and all that went along with the technology.

  9. The circuit alone is outstanding. I tube twi functions. Some say simple. Really ? Show me you design then. Oh I see. You have built it yet but….
    I operate a single tube Cw station almost every night. I have to have a seperatesingle tube Rx . There is no goood reason . All the parts for both ar e there. I find this ingeneous. I want to make one if I cant find one.
    Don VE3LYX

  10. John Nix KC0KBG says:

    I remember ads for this and similar items from that company in Popular Science, Popular Mechanics and similar magazines.
    The first two changes I would have made to it would be phone jacks for key and headphones and a resistor across the filament side of the T/R switch to keep the filament warm but save batteries.
    The price was set to appeal to the Boy Scout market.
    The Boy Scouts had 1 and 2 tube broadcast radio kits that came in corrigated cardboard boxes that were the radio’s case. You occasionally see them on EBay.
    The best radio that I saw for the Boy Scout market was a 2 tube battery and earphone broadcast SUPERHET published as a plan in Popular Mechanics in the early 1950′s.
    If I could find the parts I might build one for fun, and maybe a second for 80/40 ham use.
    The early novice transmitters were usually had one wire to serve as antenna lead and no PI network.
    The Popular Mechanics novice 80M transmitter had a PI network.
    The most interesting transmitter from that era was a 1 tube 80 Meter WWII Civil Defence transmitter that John W. Campbell published in Popular Science in 1942 or 1943.
    It was mains powered without a transformer using a 117 Volt filament Rectifier Diode-Pentode combination. Add a PI network and you would have had a first class novice transmitter if you didn’t mind the shock hazard.

Speak Your Mind

*